Andrew J. Romig, “Be a Perfect Man”

نویسندگان

چکیده

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Andrew J

Real-time developers and engineers must not only meet the system functional requirements, but also the stringent timing requirements. One of the critical decisions leading to meeting these timing requirements is the selection of an operating system under which the software will be developed and run. Although there is ample documentation on real-time systems performance and evaluation, little ca...

متن کامل

Andrew J. King

Andrew King is a Wellcome Principal Research Fellow and Professor of Neurophysiology at the University of Oxford and a Fellow of Merton College. He is also the current Director of Oxford’s Wellcome Trust four year PhD studentship programme in neuroscience. He studied physiology at King’s College London and carried out his PhD at the National Institute for Medical Research. He then moved to Oxfo...

متن کامل

Andrew M . Cheadle Warwick Harvey Andrew J . Sadler Joachim Schimpf

ion before(task(Si,Di), task(Sj,Dj)) :Si+Di #<= Sj. Conjunction between(X,Y,Z) :X #< Y, Y #< Z. Disjunction (but see below) neighbour(X,Y) :( X #= Y+1 ; Y #= X+1 ). Iteration not_among(X, L) :( foreach(Y,L),param(X) do X #\= Y ). Recursion not_among(X, []). not_among(X, [Y|Ys]) :X #\= Y, not_among(X, Ys). 11.4 Same Problem Different Model There are often many ways of modelling a problem. Consid...

متن کامل

Andrew D. Booth - Britain's Other "Fourth Man"

Andrew Donald Booth (1918-2009) was the leader of a team of computer pioneers at Birkbeck College in the University of London, UK. Booth worked with limited resources, both human and financial, and concentrated on building smaller machines. This paper presents an outline of his career in the UK which, the author believes, has not received the attention it deserves in comparison to a number of h...

متن کامل

Can unequal be more fair? A response to Andrew Avins.

In this paper, we respond to Andrew Avins's recent review of methods whose use he advocates in clinical trials, to make them more ethical. He recommends in particular, "unbalanced randomisation". However, we argue that, before such a recommendation can be made, it is important to establish why unequal randomisation might offer ethical advantages over equal randomisation, other things being equa...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Storicamente

سال: 2020

ISSN: 1825-411X

DOI: 10.12977/stor767